US Federal Court Rules in Favor of Ambazonia’s Independence Campaign

US Court Rules In Favor of Ambazonia’ Independence Campaign

US Federal Court Rules in Favor of Ambazonia’s Independence Campaign

https://agovc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/US-Court-Rules-In-Favor-of-Ambazonia’-Independence-Campaign.jpg

Tapang Ivo Tanku, Ambazonia Defense Spokesman and winner of the case against Cameroun

George Nwoleza, California

A Federal California
Court, USA, in a final ruling on Tuesday cleared the way for Ambazonia’s
independence by dismissing all international terrorism claims against
Ambazonia’s Tapang Ivo Tanku and ordering the plaintiff, Cameroun disguised in
the person of Nsahlai Emmanuel, to immediately pay the defendant $5,567.25
within 60 days. 

After reviewing 561
pages of the plaintiff’s terrorism-related evidence against the Ambazonia
Defense Forces spokesman Tapang Ivo Tanku, the presiding United States
Magistrate Judge, Nathanael M. Cousins, found that all claims were “highly
frivolous,” and that the Cameroun-trained attorney Nsahlai Emmanuel had a “bad
faith” against Ambazonia’s independence struggle. 

“The Court finds that
Mr. Nsahlai exhibited subjective bad faith in his refusal to participate in
discovery while expending both the defendant’s and the Court’s time by
prolonging the litigation—through, for instance, filing a third temporary
restraining order—rather than voluntarily dismissing the case,” says the final
ruling.

The judge’s ruling
further exposes the quack Cameroun attorney, Nsahlai Emmanuel, to more severe
sanctions by the California bar if he cannot pay Tapang Ivo Tanku within 60
days. “The Court awards the defendant a total of $5,567.25 in fees representing
the time spent working on discovery motions beginning September 1, 2019,” the
judgement reads.

Hear the US Judge:
Plaintiffs’ counsel, Emmanuel Nsahlai, so unreasonably multiplied the
proceedings in this case that it is appropriate for him “to satisfy personally
the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of
such conduct.” 

In December 2019,
quack lawyer Nsahlai—coincidentally, an African name meaning a case-loser—was
ordered by Judge Nathanael Cousins to unconditionally reveal the names of his
so-called pseudo plaintiffs. Sensing that he could be debarred following an
Order to Show Cause in November 2019, Nshalai Emmanuel quickly opted to dismiss
the case he initially brought before the same court. 

The court, however,
denied Nsalai’s request and ordered that Tapang’s counsel, Curtis Edmonson,
propose any form of sanctions against such a quack legal practice. IP attorney
Curtis Edmonson is one of America’s finest attorneys in litigation, licensed in
over 10 states. He also holds a Masters’ Degree in Electrical Engineering.

Nsahlai Law Firm, plaintiff lawyers and losers in the case against Tapang Ivo and Ambazonia

“Putting Curtis
Edmonson vs Emmanuel Nshalai in the ring is like putting an elephant vs a rant.
Nsahlai is a quack, to begin with,” says Ngong Wilson, an Ambazonian citizen
resident in the USA. 

No one can stop
Ambazonia’s independence quest, Judge Cousins said in court, arguing that the
right to purchase guns and bullets is protected in the US Constitutional Second
Amendment rights. He emphasized that self-defense is not a crime and cannot be
termed terrorism in a frivolous attempt to trample upon the rights of
individuals to existence and safety.

The Cameroun-hired
lawyer had intended to use the court judgment in blocking all channels of
material support to Ambazonia’s homeland defense against Cameroun military
terrorists.

Three attempts to
temporarily restrain Tapang in the USA were all denied by the court. “You
cannot use the US court to chase the political enemies of dictator Paul Biya
and his decades-old regime,” Nsahlai was told in the face. “This case lacks
merits on all fronts. It appears to be a political tool of the Cameroon
government.”

While investigating
attorney Nsahlai, Tapang’s reputable attorney Curtis Edmondson found that the
quack Cameroun lawyer was kicked out of his office two years ago, although he
still illegally maintains the former address. “He is an attorney without an
office.” 

Speaking to Tapang Ivo
Tanku on a phone line, he told AmbaNews24 that he dedicates the
awarded cost of $5,567.25 to the purchase of guns and bullets for Ambazonia
soldiers defending women and children, adding that one gun would be baptized
“Nsahlai gun.” They should use the guns only against Cameroun military
terrorists, Tapang cautions. 

“This is not a Tapang
victory. It is an Ambazonia victory against Cameroun through the Ambazonia
Governing Council and its Ambazonia Defense Forces. This is the first
international case Ambazonia has won in the USA against Cameroun. It
legitimizes Ambazonia and its people. It would be referenced in future
litigations by other countries. Everyone who once feared to donate for
self-defense can now do so without fear of judiciary sanctions,” Tapang humbly
stated.

Source link

Leave a Reply